n the eve of what turned out to be his first loss in a competitive match in charge of the United States men’s national team and the end of his honeymoon with his newish employers, Mauricio Pochettino said something accidentally prescient.
“Football is about timing and it’s about form and the situation of the player,” he said to a room of reporters ahead of the US’s 1-0 loss to Panama.
At the time, form appeared to be on the affable Argentinian’s side. At Milan, Christian Pulisic is putting on some of his best soccer of his career. Impossibly, Weston McKennie has regained his steadfastness at Juventus, the very club that tries to sign him every summer. Tyler Adams is finally healthy and ticking over sweetly at the base of the Bournemouth midfield. Josh Sargent is having yet another productive season with Norwich in the Championship. Chris Richards has grown into his immense potential at the heart of the Crystal Palace defense. You could go on like that for a little while longer.
Timing, on the other hand, is no longer Pochettino’s friend.
In the Concacaf Nations League semi-final on Thursday in Los Angeles, he said he wanted to “destroy” Panama. However, he quickly added that he meant it “in the sports way,” avoiding delving into the politics of an expansionist president. Panama, of course, had already defeated the United States twice in the sides’ last two non-friendly meetings. In the 2023 Gold Cup, Los Canaleros triumphed on penalties in the semi-final. A 2-1 come-from-behind win in last summer’s stateside Copa América sent the dominoes tumbling towards a humiliating group stage elimination, Gregg Berhalter’s firing and, ultimately, Pochettino’s hire.
On Thursday, the Americans looked jittery, disjointed and lethargic in the first half and, while brighter and more energetic in the second, they were incapable of breaking down the tightly packed Panamanians. American strikers Sargent and Patrick Agyemang, who took his place, missed a number of chances, but Panama’s Cecilio Waterman scored in the 94th minute, beating a misplaced Matt Turner at the far post. Tyler Adams’ 98th-minute rocket half-volley from the edge of the box came within inches of saving his team.
On the CBS broadcast, which had been swarmed by the Panamanian team as Waterman celebrated with his idol, Thierry Henry, analysts Clint Dempsey and Mo Edu were unsparing.
Dempsey stated, “We weren’t good enough.” “It’s an embarrassment.”
Edu added, “This feeling feels too familiar.” “One team had a plan. And they executed that plan. Panama was that team. Pochettino, for his part, was under no illusions about what had gone wrong. Not enough aggression on the ball in the first half, which he called “really painful.”
We are USA, but you cannot win with your shirt,” he added in his post-game press conference. “You have to come here and improve, suffer, win fights, and work hard. If not, it’s not going to be enough.”
This now makes it three consecutive tournaments on home soil where the US has faceplanted, each time to Panama. With just under 15 months remaining until the 2026 World Cup, played mostly in the US, something beginning to approximate a panic will set in now.
In terms of meaningful competitions to prepare for the big dance, only this summer’s Gold Cup remains. But this event is far from ideal – it will pit the Yanks against the same old Concacaf competition (plus Saudi Arabia), and the US will have to contest it without Juventus players McKennie and Tim Weah and probably Borussia Dortmund’s Gio Reyna, who should all be away contesting the Club World Cup at the same time.
Nonetheless, the defeat at Panama might be useful in some way. The Americans will get to play a feisty opponent in Canada on Sunday all the same, and with a great deal to prove (and no small amount of political pressure). They can take some consolation in a late defeat absent their injured starting full-backs Antonee Robinson and Sergiño Dest – just the sort of attacking talents who could have broken down the narrow Canaleros from the flanks. Leading strikers Ricardo Pepi and Folarin Balogun, also injured, were also much missed.
Perhaps helpfully, Pochettino has been exposed as a merely mortal coach. The halo is gone. The players under his supervision are virtually identical to those under Berhalter. They continue to exhibit the same flaws, which include a propensity for initiating crucial games without the necessary energy and a persistent difficulty dissecting low defensive blocks. There may yet be value in this realization.
History may also provide some comfort in this situation. There is a long list of host nations that came into their home World Cup after a troubling run of form. Ahead of the 1986 World Cup, Mexico suffered a series of shaky performances, culminating in a 3-0 loss to England in their final tune-up. But El Tri, managed by Bora Milutinović – who would take over the US in 1994, as it happens – made a run to the quarter-final, matching its best performance ever.
The Americans struggled through their preparations in 1994, losing to Iceland, a total non-factor in international soccer at the time, Romania, Sweden, Chile, and, worst of all, Iceland. These defeats were wedged around a series of insipid ties with unimpressive opponents. Yet the Yanks made the second round at the World Cup, losing 1-0 to eventual champions Brazil and setting the stage for the modern era of American soccer as we know it today.
Before winning the World Cup in Paris in 1998, France only won two of its six matches. Germany lost 4-1 to Italy just three months before staging the 2006 World Cup, where it would make a surprise run to the semi-finals regardless. South Africa couldn’t beat Namibia or North Korea as it prepared for the 2010 World Cup, where it was nevertheless competitive and a tad unlucky not to advance from the group stage.
At least with that information, USMNT fans can take a deep breath and think about other host teams that have pulled together at the last minute. Having said that, the Americans need to do a lot of work to get there. A book about the men’s soccer team of the United States that Leander Schaerlaeckens is working on will be published in 2026. He teaches at Marist University.
Congratulations on being one of our most popular readers worldwide—in the past year, you’ve read 372 articles. Article count
on
This is what we have to contend with. Online disinformation is being spread by bad actors to promote intolerance and undermine democracy. A media ecosystem dominated by a handful of billionaire owners.
Teams of lawyers from the rich and powerful trying to stop us publishing stories they don’t want you to see.
Lobby groups with opaque funding who are determined to undermine facts about the climate emergency and other established science.
States that are authoritarian and have no regard for press freedom. ***
However, we have a powerful advantage. We have your back. This is why we’re inviting you to access our brilliant, investigative journalism with exclusive digital extras to unlock:
1. Unlimited articles in our app
2. Ad-free reading on all your devices
3. Weekly newsletter sent exclusively to supporters by Guardian newsroom 4. Far fewer asks for support
5. Full access to the Guardian Feast app
The Guardian is funded by readers like you in Pakistan and the only person who decides what we publish is our editor. If you can, please support us on a monthly basis. It takes less than a minute to set up, and you can rest
